Western media miss the real Tibet story
By Michael BackmanThe AgeApril 9, 2008
Beyond China, there are many vested interests wanting a stake in the future of Tibetan rule.
AFTER several years of highlighting wrongdoers in Asia in these pages and providing viewpoints that run counter to prevailing wisdom, I've at last received my first death threat.
Probably not that serious (it came anonymously by email) but something of a career milestone, nonetheless. It came from someone who claims to be a Tibetan refugee in India and a follower of the Dalai Lama.
My correspondent informed me that the next time I visit India I will be killed (eaten, he said) and my family will never find my body.
What annoyed my correspondent was a column I wrote last year for The Age in which I highlighted some aspects of the Dalai Lama that most media reports ignore: the fact that in running his government in exile, he has been extraordinarily nepotistic by appointing many relatives to senior positions, and that during the 1950s, '60s and into the '70s he was personally on the CIA's payroll, for example.
Last week, the column was reproduced without permission on a North American website and, in the context of the problems in Tibet, it added to the already fraught emotions of those who care strongly about this issue.
The original column was written to coincide with the Dalai Lama's visit to Australia last year. It was written to counterbalance the huge, uncritical media coverage given to the Dalai Lama in the Australian media at that time.
I have always felt that the coverage accorded to the Dalai Lama in the Western media has been excessively favourable and uncritical, just as the media coverage in China of the Dalai Lama is appallingly biased but in the negative.
Clearly, in the past few weeks, ethnic Tibetans have been killed by the Chinese military. This has been widely reported.
But it is also clear that ethnic Chinese have been murdered by ethnic Tibetans in racially based attacks. This has not been made as clear in the Western media. And yet, the Western media were rightly appalled in 1998 when ethnic Chinese were raped and murdered in Jakarta for similar reasons — perceived excessive economic control at the expense of non-Chinese locals.
In Lhasa, four Chinese girls and one Tibetan girl were burned alive when a clothing store in which they worked was set alight by Tibetan protesters. But the rampage against the Chinese was not as simple as an attack on Han Chinese. Ethnic Chinese Muslim traders were also rounded on. Muslim traders have a centuries-old presence in Lhasa, a legacy of the ancient Silk Road. But in the unrest two weeks ago, the main mosque in Lhasa's old quarter was also burned down.
The apparent swamping of Tibetan culture by Chinese migrants is a tragedy. But the killing of ethnic Chinese small-business people, or indeed anyone else, is also wrong and no doubt one of the reasons why the Dalai Lama has threatened to resign.
But again, the treatment of this seems to suggest the Western media have their own bias when it comes to reporting on Tibet. Unfortunately, this blunts criticism that can be made of China when it comes to its own propagandising.
With regards to China and Tibet, unequivocal right does not reside on either side. Both sides point to sound historical arguments to bolster their case. China genuinely believes that Tibet has long been a part of China. The Tibetans genuinely believe the opposite.
Ordinary Chinese in China regard the Tibetans as thankless and selfish. On my last visit to Beijing, one young Chinese described them as aggressive and unappreciative of all the development that China has provided them. I told him that their main concern is that they are being swamped by Chinese migrants seemingly as a calculated attempt at cultural genocide. A look of surprise flashed across his face. He'd not heard this argument before and yet its logic clearly appealed to him. He'd never heard it because the Chinese media have never reported it.
Nationalism has been rising in China, so it is unlikely that such a view will get a hearing in China. Many Western investors will probably find their passage in China eased if they make clear statements in favour of China on the issue too.
Potentially, China did do ordinary Tibetans a great service when it overthrew the rule of the Dalai Lama, the rich monasteries and a coterie of wealthy aristocratic families whose members typically were so laden with Sicilian coral, Iranian turquoise and Burmese rubies that they could barely move. The overthrow has its parallel in King Henry VIII's dissolution of the monasteries of England that had developed a stranglehold over the land and the lives of the peasants.
Unfortunately, in Tibet's case, what replaced theocratic, self-serving rule was scarcely much better — the Chinese Communist Party. The local despots were replaced by foreign ones.
The first Starbucks in Lhasa is probably only one or two years away. This is a tragedy, too, particularly for the many rich Western travellers who would rather Tibet stay stuck in the Middle Ages for their own personal enjoyment, much in the same way economic sanctions have preserved Burma as the world's largest living museum.
The vested interests that surround the Tibet issue are many and make it a great deal more complicated than simple slogans such as "Free Tibet" suggest. If China is ever going to neutralise this issue, it is going to have to learn to act with a level of sophistication, maturity and self-confidence that it now lacks. Apologising to Tibetans for their suffering under Chinese rule will need to be part of the package. But obviously such a degree of enlightenment is years off.
ends
web address for column on the Age website:
http://business.theage.com.au/western-media-miss-the-real-tibet-story/20080408-24nz.html
"Smoke a cigarette and drink some beer!" Well, I will appreciate that if you practice that in class... Nah, just joking! Thank you for making this class being a so interactive and interesting one. ありがとうございます! Without you, it would not be possible to provide a platform to practice "freedom of speech" in the class. I really appreciate that.
Frankly speaking, you all have changed some of my (not so positive) thoughts towards students who came from China. You all are more friendlier than I thought. Thank you for sharing your experiences and informations from China. I have learnt a lot from them. To Li Hui, Xue Jie, and Guo Cheng, I had a great time mixing with you all as a group. It is also interesting to mix around with the rest of you.
Strange but true, the smallest group in class. If any of you ever felt humiliated (the word sounds too serious) because you have failed the QET, think again. Perhaps you are the lucky ones who get the chance to mix with all the classmates and also Sensei. Living 18 years across the Straits of Johor (Malaysians call it Selat Tebrau), I consider myself as a 'half local'. Perhaps my understandings of Singapore might be a little bit better in certain aspects, but you all still, have provided me much insights of Singapore. Nice one!
I have the most to talk about in this part. Thank you all for making Malaysians proud. We have seen the event, which can change the future of our home, from our neighbor. Channel News Asia does provide better coverage during and after the election than the 
The recycling process starts with the collection of recyclable waste. The government has to provide more active recycling stations, especially in the densely populated areas. Furthermore, these recycling stations have to be maintained in good condition as currently some of the stations are in a bad operating condition and hence, abandoned by the people.
The Kyoto Protocol is a 1997 international treaty based on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which has the objective of "stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system" (UNFCCC, 1992). As of November 2007, 174 countries have signed and ratified the protocol (“List of Kyoto Protocol signatories”, 2008). Henson (2006) noted that the Kyoto Protocol is a political approach to require the participating nations to cut their emissions of six greenhouse gases stated above to meet the emissions target based on the 1990 values, in the “commitment period” from 2008 to 2012 (Henson, 2006). 
