The Rising Sea Level – How Kyoto Protocol Addresses the Problem (edited)

Identify an existing problem that is being caused by climate change in the world today and explain how that problem can be addressed.

The rise in sea level has become one of the major environmental concerns since the 20th century. Coastal areas around the world are being threatened by the rising sea level and the entire surface of the Earth will be affected in the long run. According to Church et al (2001), the thermal expansion of sea water and the melting of Earth’s ice caps are found to be the major contributors to the change sea level (Church et al, 2001). Through satellite observations, Juniper (2007) found that the extent of sea ice has an average decrease of 2.7% per decade since 1978 while more than 7% of summer melting has been recorded (Juniper, 2007). These signs of changes are indeed sharing a common factor, which is the climate change resulting from the enhanced greenhouse effect. To address the problem of rising sea level, the Kyoto Protocol, which has become an initiative to counteract the impact of enhanced greenhouse effect, needs full recognition and cooperation by all nations.

The idea of building seawalls to prevent seawater from flooding the coastal areas may sound attractive, but it only offers a short-term solution to the problem. Besides, this idea is impractical to be implemented due to the large coastal area that needs to be protected. In contrast, actions have to be taken straight to the source of global warming, in which what the Kyoto Protocol have done. The Kyoto Protocol, being a notable cross-national effort, has been set up to cut down the emission of greenhouse gases. According to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1998), the six targeted greenhouse gases are identified to be carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), herfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) (UNFCCC, 1998).

The Kyoto Protocol is a 1997 international treaty based on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which has the objective of "stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system" (UNFCCC, 1992). As of November 2007, 174 countries had signed and ratified the protocol (“List of Kyoto Protocol signatories”, 2008). Henson (2006) noted that the Kyoto Protocol is a political approach to require the participating nations to cut their emissions of six greenhouse gases stated above to meet the emissions target based on the 1990 values, in the “commitment period” from 2008 to 2012 (Henson, 2006).

In response to the protocol, different mechanisms are being practiced by the participating countries. Henson (2006) and “Emissions trading” (2008) pointed out carbon trading (or emission trading) is one of the mechanisms that work along with the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI) projects to control greenhouse emissions (Henson, 2006) (“Emissions trading”, 2008). It is implemented actively in the European Union and has become one of the major components in the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) that supports Kyoto Protocol (“Emissions trading”, 2008). Under this scheme, all corporations are given a cap or quota for emission of greenhouse gas that will be lowered over time. If a corporation has excess allowance of emission, the allowance can be either sold to other corporations that exceed the emission limit, or donated to nonprofit organizations to gain other benefits, such as tax reduction.

Although some countries never ratify the Kyoto Protocol up to today, the protocol, indirectly, has created strong influence about climate issues to these countries. The United States, which contributes about a quarter of greenhouse emissions to the world according to Juniper (2007), has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol until today, despite the strong support from countries around the world. Juniper also discovered that the incentives of carbon trading, as well as the shift of public opinions in climate change have sparked commercial interests that eventually lead the government to adapt practices to control the greenhouse emissions (Juniper, 2007).

From what we have seen, we can draw conclusion that the Kyoto Protocol is in fact a successful treaty that unites the world in order to overcome the problem of rising sea level. Although it is too early for the results of Kyoto Protocool to be evaluated, we should indeed recognize and appreciate this multinational effort for the sake our future generation.

Here's Another One from WWF



"Every second, the planet loses another 2 football fields of its precious rainforests."

The Panda Strikes Back

let's see how bloody the panda can be


Earth Hour 2008

"It started with a question: How can we inspire people to take action on climate change?

The answer: Ask the people of Sydney to turn off their lights for one hour.


Created to take a stand against the greatest threat our planet has ever faced, Earth Hour uses the simple action of turning off the lights for one hour to deliver a powerful message about the need for action on global warming.

This simple act has captured the hearts and minds of people all over the world. As a result, at 8pm March 29, 2008 millions of people in some of the world’s major capital cities, including Copenhagen, Toronto, Chicago, Melbourne, Brisbane and Tel Aviv will unite and switch off for Earth Hour."





Find out more about Earth Hour:

Why 60? FYI that's the number of minutes in an hour. That's all.

One question here. Should Singapore have been on the list?

*Update*
Here's the poster from Boon:

Nus Earth Hour

Check out more from earthhoursingapore.blogspot.com

Timed Paragraph Practice

Taking the perspective of a future engineer, propose one thing that your country (people and/or government) can do to solve the waste disposal problem(s) facing your country this century.

Waste disposal is always a big headache for developing countries around the world, and so it is in Malaysia. The government of Malaysia has encouraged its people to recycle, but the recycling system and machinery that are being implemented by the government are far behind from the optimum efficiency. To deal with the problem, nationwide waste recycling system has to be reorganized to optimize the overall performance of the entire recycling process.

The recycling process starts with the collection of recyclable waste. The government has to provide more active recycling stations, especially in the densely populated areas. Furthermore, these recycling stations have to be maintained in good condition as currently some of the stations are in a bad operating condition and hence, abandoned by the people.

Meanwhile, the currently ineffective recycling process is also due to the lack of awareness in the public. Some of the people are not even aware of the recycle bins despite the bins being placed in public areas in the country. Therefore, the government should educate and attain awareness from the public through mass media in different languages used by different ethnic groups in the country. This is essential to trigger the people’s response so that they will be actively involved in the collection of recyclable waste. The involvement by the people is so crucial that it would eventually lead to the significant reduction of total waste.

As a conclusion, the sufficiency of waste handling technology is not the main challenge faced in the waste handling process in Malaysia. It is the effort and cooperation of the government and people that will finally lead to the success in reducing waste through recycling.

The Rising Sea Level – How Kyoto Protocol Addresses the Problem

Identify an existing problem that is being caused by climate change in the world today and explain how that problem can be addressed.

The rise in sea level has become one of the major environmental concerns since the 20th century. Coastal areas around the world are being threatened by the rising sea level and the entire surface of the Earth will be affected in the long run. According to Church et al (2001), the thermal expansion of sea water the melting of Earth’s ice caps are found to be the major contributors of the change sea level (Church et al, 2001). Through satellite observations, Juniper (2007) found that the extent of sea ice has an average decrease of 2.7% per decade since 1978 while more than 7% of summer melting has been recorded (Juniper, 2007). These signs of changes are indeed sharing a common factor, which is the climate change resulted from the enhanced greenhouse effect.

In order to address to problem, we definitely cannot just build seawalls to prevent seawater from flooding the coastal areas. Instead, we have to take action straight to the source of global warming, which is caused by the excessive emission of greenhouse gases. Cross-national efforts, notably the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, have been made to cut down the emission of greenhouse gases. According to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1998), the six targeted greenhouse gases are identified to be carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), herfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) (UNFCCC, 1998).

The Kyoto Protocol is a 1997 international treaty based on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which has the objective of "stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system" (UNFCCC, 1992). As of November 2007, 174 countries have signed and ratified the protocol (“List of Kyoto Protocol signatories”, 2008). Henson (2006) noted that the Kyoto Protocol is a political approach to require the participating nations to cut their emissions of six greenhouse gases stated above to meet the emissions target based on the 1990 values, in the “commitment period” from 2008 to 2012 (Henson, 2006).

In response to the protocol, different mechanisms are being practiced by the participating countries. Henson (2006) and “Emissions trading” (2008) pointed out carbon trading (or emission trading) is one of the mechanisms that work along with the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI) projects to control greenhouse emissions (Henson, 2006) (“Emissions trading”, 2008). It is implemented actively in the European Union and has become one of the major components in the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) that supports Kyoto Protocol (“Emissions trading”, 2008). Under this scheme, all corporations are given a cap or quota for emission of greenhouse gas that will be lowered over time. If a corporation has excess allowance of emission, the allowance can be either sold to other corporations that exceed the emission limit, or donated to nonprofit organizations to gain other benefits, such as tax reduction.


Although some countries never ratify the Kyoto Protocol up to today, the protocol, indirectly, has created strong influence about climate issues to these countries. The United States, which contributes about a quarter of greenhouse emissions to the world according to Juniper (2007), has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol until today, despite the strong support from countries around the world. Juniper also discovered that the incentives of carbon trading, as well as the shift of public opinions in climate change have sparked commercial interests that eventually lead the government to adapt practices to control the greenhouse emissions (Juniper, 2007).

From what we have seen, we can draw conclusion that the Kyoto Protocol is in fact a successful treaty that unites the world in order to overcome the problem of rising sea level. Although the results of Kyoto Protocol are still too early to be evaluated, we should indeed recognize and appreciate this multinational effort for our future generation.

Saving Nature, Not Only for Man

I have been observing the relationship between human and animals, as well as human with nature for some time. Some issues always bring me into deep thoughts. Why animals are always being be the subject of experiment before human? Why only animals but not human must be killed to prevent the spreading of infectious disease? Why environment must always be sacrifice for the benefit of human? Anyway, the first two questions will lead to some other long stories, but the latter is I want to talk about.

After reading the article 'Saving Nature, But Only for Man', I felt that there are some conflicts between the ideas mentioned in the article with those stored in my mind.

I think that the interaction between human and nature is not critical. The idea of sane environmentalism is so confined that either human or nature has to be sacrificed. This makes me feels that human and nature are in competition, and fighting each other on the limited lands on earth. In contrast, what is in my mind is a totally different idea. The relationship between nature and human, for me, was considered as a mutual symbiosis. However, further thinking made me think that this isn't totally true. In fact, human is part of the nature itself.

From a religious point of view, some (or perhaps all) of the religious founders were 'enlightened' in a totally natural environment. Gautama Buddha, the founder of Buddhism was enlightened under the Bodhi tree. Prophet Muhammad had his first spiritual encounter with (angel) Gabriel when he was meditating in a cave on Mount Hira. These suggests that human and nature are inseparable. Human has to be in harmony, not in antagonism, with nature. In Taoism, the 'Tao' aspect emphasizes the natural order of the universe, which human is part of this natural order, and therefore inseparable.

Apart from the non-religious point of view, I sensed the article has simulated several conditions which only extreme decisions can be made. These cases might happen to be real, but instead of thinking of the extreme ends of the choices, there might be a point where equilibrium can be established to minimize all negative effects to both parties, the human and the environment. Moreover, in some cases, alternate solutions can lead the problem to be solved in a win-win situation. Several issues can be raised from the case of man and caribou. Must there be war at the first place before oil? Must energy always have to depend on oil? Isn't that the wastage of energy by human is a more important concern compared to oil dependency? I personally think that rather than making choices, there are always different ways to solve a problem.

Back to the beginning. The first two questions mentioned are still doubting me. However, when comes to the relationship between nature and human, I have a strong belief that nature and human are one and more important, this idea has to be the core when solving environmental problems we are facing today.

The 'New' Generation of Technology Users

The world is changing so fast. Even the elder 'silver hair' generation don't want to be pushed behind the waves of new technology.

I wonder what kinda music this uncle will store in the player if he owns it. Is it 白光, the Beatles or Britney Spears? I guess I'll leave that question for himself.

Bravo, uncle!

Problem - Solution

Identify an existing problem that is being caused by climate change in the world today and explain how that problem can be addressed.

The rise in sea level has become one of the major environmental concerns since the 20th century. Coastal areas around the world are being threatened by the rising sea level and the entire surface of Earth will be affected in a long run. Sea level rise is due to thermal expansion of sea water as well as the melting of Earth's ice cap, both of which impact of the drastic change in climate. In order to deal with this problem, we definitely cannot just building seawalls to prevent seawater from flowing into our land. Instead, we have to take action straight to the source of global warming, which is caused by excessive emission of greenhouse gases. Cross-national efforts have been made to cut down the emission of greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide.
The Kyoto Protocol, which has been ratified by the majority of countries in the world, has the objective of "stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system" (The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2008). In response to the Protocol, different measures are being done by countries around the world. For instance, carbon trading is implemented in the European Union and has become one of the major component is the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS). Under this scheme, all corporations are given a cap or quota for emission of greenhouse gas that will be lowered over time. If a corporation has excess allowance of emission, the allowance can be either sold to other corporations that exceed the emission limit, or donated to nonprofit organizations to gain other benefits, such as tax reduction. In short, we cannot overcome the problem of rising sea level without eliminating the sources that are causing the problem. The elimination of the sources of the problem requires cooperation of all global communities to work as a whole.




Reference:
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2005). Article 2. Retrieved on February 17, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/background/items/1353.php

My blogging buddy: Lihui